Evaluating the Risk-Return Profile of a Portfolio of ESG and Traditional Assets Using a Hybrid Optimisation Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2025.08.01(2)Keywords:
portfolio rebalancing; sustainable investment; risk-adjusted returns; ESG and Non-ESG assets allocation; shape ratio; support vector machine algorithmsAbstract
This article examines the risk-return dynamics of portfolios combining environmental, social, and governance (ESG) assets with traditional investment instruments. A hybrid optimisation framework is applied, uniting mean-variance principles with combinatorial selection and machine learning techniques. The study addresses two central questions: whether ESG funds provide diversification benefits, and whether they mitigate downside risk in periods of financial stress. The analysis draws on a dataset of five ESG and five non-ESG funds, spanning varied sectors and risk profiles, observed over a five-year horizon marked by diverse macroeconomic conditions. Portfolio performance is evaluated using the Sharpe ratio, with differential evolution and support vector machine algorithms employed to capture linear and non-linear aspects of risk-adjusted returns. The findings reveal a consistent positive association between ESG allocation and portfolio performance. Optimised portfolios frequently allocated 80-90 per cent of their weight to ESG assets, particularly GRID and ESGV. ESG holdings were shown to strengthen diversification, improve upside potential, and reduce downside exposure, especially during volatile market phases. Traditional assets contributed stability but played a weaker role in enhancing risk-adjusted returns. Statistical analysis confirmed both research hypotheses: portfolios integrating ESG investments achieved higher Sharpe ratios without excessive risk, and ESG funds demonstrated resilience under adverse conditions. Machine learning models further underscored the significance of non-linear patterns, which enhanced the explanatory power of ESG exposure in the optimisation process. In sum, the study contributes to growing evidence that ESG assets not only advance sustainability objectives but also deliver measurable financial benefits. The hybrid methodological approach illustrates the importance of balanced allocation constraints and robust optimisation in portfolio design. These results suggest that incorporating ESG assets can simultaneously reinforce financial stability and support long-term sustainable development.
Downloads
References
1. Chitimiea, A., Minciu, M., Manta, A.-M., Ciocoiu, C. N., & Veith, C. (2021). The drivers of green investment: A bibliometric and systematic review. Sustainability, 13(6), Article 3507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063507
2. Inderst, G., Kaminker, C., & Stewart, F. (2012). Defining and measuring green investments: Implications for institutional investors' asset allocations (OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, No. 24). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9312twnn44-en
3. Akala, C. S., Neuhaus, T., & O’Leary-Govender, I. (2022). A systematic review of sustainable investment approaches. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 14(12), Article 72. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v14n12p72
4. Yue, X. G., Han, Y., Teresiene, D., Merkyte, J., & Liu, W. (2020). Sustainable funds’ performance evaluation. Sustainability, 12(19), Article 8034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198034
5. Dmuchowski, P., Dmuchowski, W., Baczewska-Dąbrowska, A. H., & Gworek, B. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) model; impacts and sustainable investment–Global trends and Poland's perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 329, Article 117023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117023
6. Popescu, I. S., Schaubroeck, T., Gibon, T., Petucco, C., & Benetto, E. (2024). Investment funds are responsible for substantial environmental and social impacts. Communications Earth & Environment, 5(1), 355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01479-4
7. Stein, Z. (2024). Green investment fund. Carbon Collective. https://www.carboncollective.co/sustainable-investing/green-investment-fund
8. Adamo, R., Federico, D., & Notte, A. (2014). Performance and risk of green funds. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 11(1), 134-145.
9. Belaid, F., Al-Sarihi, A., & Al-Mestneer, R. (2023). Balancing climate mitigation and energy security goals amid converging global energy crises: The role of green investments. Renewable Energy, 205(C), 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.083
10. Agoraki, M.-E. K., Aslanidis, N., & Kouretas, G. P. (2023). How has COVID-19 affected the performance of green investment funds? Journal of International Money and Finance, 131, Article 102792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102792
11. Chi, Y., & Liu, D. (2023). Measuring the island tourism development sustainability at dual spatial scales using a four-dimensional model: A case study of Shengsi archipelago, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 388, Article 135775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135775
12. Alessandrini, F., & Jondeau, E. (2020). Optimal strategies for ESG portfolios. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper, (20-21). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3578830
13. Capotă, L.-D., Giuzio, M., Kapadia, S., & Salakhova, D. (2022). Are ethical and green investment funds more resilient? European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 2747.
14. Arfaoui, N., Naeem, M. A., Maherzi, T., & Kayani, U. N. (2024). Can green investment funds hedge climate risk? Finance Research Letters, 60, Article 104961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104961
15. Yousaf, I., Suleman, M. T., & Demirer, R. (2022). Green investments: A luxury good or a financial necessity? Energy Economics, 105, Article 105745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105745
16. Chang, C. E., Nelson, W. A., & Witte, H. D. (2012). Do green mutual funds perform well? Management Research Review, 35(8), 693–708. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235263419_Do_green_mutual_fu nds_perform_well
17. Kurtz, L., & DiBartolomeo, D. (1996). Socially screened portfolios: An attribution analysis of relative performance. Journal of Investing, 5(3), 35–41.
18. Silva, F., & Cortez, M. C. (2016). The performance of US and European green funds in different market conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.112
19. Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.009
20. Guimarães, T. M., & Malaquias, R. F. (2023). Performance of equity mutual funds considering ESG investments, financial constraints, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Brazilian Business Review, 20(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2023.20.1.2.en
21. Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.06.035
22. Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R., Dalò, A., & Herzel, S. (2015). Socially responsible and conventional investment funds: Performance comparison and the global financial crisis. Applied Economics, 47(25), 2541–2562. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.1000517
23. Gao, X., Koedijk, K., Ryu, S., Wetzels, S., & Zhou, Z. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance tools and investment fund portfolio characteristics: A practical-question-oriented review. Frontiers in Sustainability, 4, Article 1323304. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1323304
24. Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: the ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142, 472–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001
25. Roy, A. D. (1952). Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica, 20(3), 431–449.
26. Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual funds performance. Journal of Business, 39(1), 119–138.
27. Farinelli, S., & Tibiletti, L. (2008). Sharpe thinking in asset ranking with one-sided measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(3), 1542–1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.020
28. Anelli, M. (2023). Reinterpreting the Sharpe Ratio as a measure of investment return from alpha. Modern Economy, 14(2), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2023.142003
29. Financial Times. (2024). Markets data. https://markets.ft.com/data
30. Kumar, N. C. A., Smith, C., Badis, L., Wang, N., Ambrosy, P., & Tavares, R. (2016). ESG factors and risk-adjusted performance: a new quantitative model. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 6(4), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1234909
31. Whelan, T., Atz, U., Van Holt, T., & Clark, C. (2021). ESG and financial performance: Uncovering the relationship by aggregating evidence from 1,000 plus studies published between 2015-2020. New York: NYU STERN Center for sustainable business, 520-536.
32. Özkan, O., Meo, M. S., & Younus, M. (2024). Unearthing the hedge and safe-haven potential of green investment funds for energy commodities. Energy Economics, 138, Article 107814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107814
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Attila Banyai, Tibor Tatay, Gergo Thalmeiner, Laszlo Pataki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
