An Agroforestry Consortium: A Multiderminant in Instituting an Agrisilviculture System to Improve Welfare

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2020.03.01(5)

Keywords:

agroforestry consortium, agrisilviculture system, public welfare, farmers

Abstract

Indonesia as the largest forest owner has a huge potential in exploration. Before 1997, Indonesia had lost 91,924,300 ha of forest due to deforestation. The government bodies just planted a thousand trees with no supervision and follow-up, so most of them were damaged and did not meet expectations. This research is carried out descriptively and qualitatively. The study is informed by the secondary data from the research library and from the relevant Government Agencies. The concept of an agroforestry consortium was based on a multi determination governance as a function, academics, education, audio-visual training system, and organizational institutions, and management rights’ holders to implement forest transfers. Land rights are ensured by financial institutions and advocacy. The agroforestry consortium as a facility for farmers which will accommodate inputs in developing human resources, capital, and forest land, which will later be allocated to farmers. In post-production, farmers will provide instalments of credit and forest products for agroforestry consortia. Thus, the funds can be channelled to financial institutions and forest products to practitioners. The agroforestry consortium is expected to ensure the welfare of the inhabitants in East Kalimantan Province. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin, B. (2001). Spektrum Kebijakan Pertanian Indonesia, Telaah Struktur, Kasus dan Alternatif Strategi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Bijalwan, A., Sharma, C.M., & Sah, V.K. (2009). Productivity status of traditional agrisilviculture system on northern and southern aspects in mid-hill situation of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Journal of Forestry Research, 20, 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-009-0024-0

BPS-Statistics of Kalimantan Timur Province. (2019). Kalimantan Timur Province in Figures 2019. Samarinda: Sekar Mulya.

Dhyani, S.K., & Tripathi, R.S. (1998). Tree growth and crop yield under agrisilvicultural practices in north-east India. Agroforestry Systems, 44, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006176303162

Faculty of Foresty, Bogor Agricultural University. (1999). The Value System of Production Forest. Bogor: Cooperation Foresty Departement and Faculty of Foresty, Bogor Agricultural University.

Foresty Office of East Kalimantan Province. (2018). An Overview of Forestry in the Regency/City of the East Kalimantan Province Year 2017. Samarinda: Kaltim in Figures.

Garrett, H.E. (2009). North American agroforestry: An integrated science and practice, 2nd ed. ASA: Madison, WI.

Harvey, D. (2006). Space as a key word. In D. Harvey (Ed.), Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development (pp. 69-116). London-New York: Verso.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (2018). Definisi Agrisilvikultur. Retrieved from https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/agrisilvikultur.
Kayatama, K., & Luna, A.C. (1998). Introduction of Agroforestry in the Philippines. JIRCAS Journal, 6, 83-88.

Lefebvre, H. (1974). The production of Space. Paris: Anthropos.

Moelong, L. (2002). Qualitative Research Methods. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nair, P.K.R. (1985). Classification of Agroforestry Systems. Agroforestry Systems, 3(1), 97-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122638

Nair, P.K.R., Gordon, A.M., & Mosquera-Losada, M.R. (2008). Agroforestry. In S.E. Jorgensen & B.D. Faith (Eds.), Encyclopedia of ecology. Vol.1 (pp.101-110). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

Nazir, M. (2003). Research Methodology, 5th Ed. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Odum, E. (1998). Dasar-dasar Ekologi. Alih Bahasa: Samingan, T & Srigandono, B. Edisi Ketiga; Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada Press.

Puri, S., & Nair, P.K.R. (2004). Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program. Agroforestry Systems, 61, 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000029014.66729.e0

Rangkuti, F. (2001). Analysis Techniques Dissecting Business Cases. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Roslinda, E. (2002). Economic Value of Forest Education and Research Unmul and It’s Contribution to The Community Around. Thesis (not a publisher). Bogor: Graduate Program, Bogor Agricultural University.

Roslinda, E. (2003). Choice of Forest Garden Management Policy (TAHURA) East Kalimantan Province. Dissertation (not publisher). Bogor: Graduate Program, Bogor Agricultural University.

Shanley, P., Pierce, A., Laird, S., & Robinson, D. (2008). Beyond timber certification and management of non-timber forest products. Bogor: CIFOR. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/002543

Soerjani, M. (1997). Pembangunan dan Lingkungan: Meniti Gagasan dan Pelaksanaan Sustainable Development. Jakarta: Institute Pendidikan dan Pengembangan Lingkungan.

Sugiyono, S. (2005). Qualitative Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suhardi, S.A., Sudjoko, S., & Minarningsih, M. (2002). Forests and Gardens as National Food. Jakarta: Kanisius.

Sutikno, S., & Maryunani, M. (2006). Ekonomi Sumber Daya Alam. Malang: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Brawijaya.

Talmod, Z. (2008). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Upaya Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Melalui Sistem Ekologi-Organik. Jurnal Agritek, 16(4), 526-538.

Vinceti, B., Eyzaguirre, P., & Johns, T. (2008). The Nutritional Role of Forest Plant Foods for Rural Communities Human Health and Forests. A global Overview of Issues. Practice and Policy (Ed. by Carol, J). Bogor: CIFOR.

Young, A. (1989). Agroforestry for Soil Conservation. ICRAF Science and Practise of Agroforestry, 16(4), 268-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7723-1_9

Downloads

Published

2020-01-27

How to Cite

Surya, D., Siti, M., Dirga, L., & Caisar, D. D. (2020). An Agroforestry Consortium: A Multiderminant in Instituting an Agrisilviculture System to Improve Welfare. Virtual Economics, 3(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2020.03.01(5)

Issue

Section

Articles