The Role of the Pareto Principle in Quality Management within Industry 4.0: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2024.07.03(1)

Keywords:

quality, Industry 4.0, artificial intelligence, machine learning, Pareto principle, quality management, sustainable management, development management

Abstract

Quality is a fundamental aspect of the management of almost every area of a company, directly influencing the efficiency of its processes. The increased importance of quality, as well as advances in industrialisation methods and computerisation, has stimulated the development of a new generation of technologies, leading to the fourth industrial revolution known as Industry 4.0. In addition to new technologies, the Pareto principle plays an important role in quality management, enabling the identification of the key factors that influence quality, emphasising that 20% of causes are responsible for 80% of quality problems. Its importance has been highlighted by the American Society for Quality (ASQ), which recognises the Pareto principle as one of the seven basic tools used in the area of process improvement. The purpose of this study is to identify the impact of the Pareto principle on quality management on the basis of a bibliometric analysis carried out to characterise the evolutionary aspects of the development of key terms specific to the area under consideration. The analysis focuses on a sample of 8002 items, and the data collected come from the extensive Scopus database of scientific articles, covering the years 1990-2024. VOSviewer software was used as a tool. On the basis of the empirical data, the exponential growth of the number of publications was confirmed in terms of the relationship between the Pareto principle and quality management. On the basis of the resulting visualisation maps, five areas (clusters) were identified and characterised in terms of keyword coincidence, and their evolutionary natures were described. This publication can serve as a basis for further considerations in the impact layer of the Pareto principle in terms of quality management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Reeves, C., & Bednar, D. (1994). Defining quality: Alternatives and implications. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 419-445. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1994.9412271805.

Kemenade, E., Pupius, M., & Hardjono, T. (2008). More value to defining quality. Quality in Higher Education, 14(3), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320802278461.

Smith, G. (1993). The meaning of quality. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 4(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544129300000038.

Anand, K. (1997). Quality: An evolving concept. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 8(2-3), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412979622.

Kenyon, G. N., & Sen, K. C. (2015). The philosophy of quality. In G. N. Kenyon & K. C. Sen (Eds.), The perception of quality: Mapping product and service quality to consumer perceptions (pp. 29-40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6627-6.

Freiesleben, J., & Pohl, T. (2004). Quality: An ethical inquiry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15(9–10), 1209–1216. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478336042000255587.

Anand, K. N. (1997). Quality: An evolving concept. Total Quality Management, 8(4), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412979622.

Anguo, X. (2004). The conception of quality in marketing. Journal of Gansu Radio & TV University, 4, 23–26.

Meng, F., & Yang, J. (2023). Process capability analysis of Taguchi index Cpm based on generalized p‐value. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 39(6), 2311–2329. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3344.

Topczewska, J., & Krupa, S. (2022). Zrównoważona logistyka żywności a technologie przemysłu 4.0. Polish Journal for Sustainable Development, 26(1), 43–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.15584/pjsd.2022.26.1.5.

Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2018). The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019.

Xu, L., Xu, E., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941–2962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806.

Bai, C., Dallasega, P., Orzes, G., & Sarkis, J. (2020). Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, Article 107776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776.

Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004.

Rane, S., Shah, P., & Sekhar, R. (2022). Survey of technologies for Industry 4.0. In 2022 6th International Conference on Computing, Communication, Control and Automation (ICCUBEA) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCUBEA54992.2022.10010837.

Sanders, R. (1987). The Pareto principle: Its use and abuse. Journal of Services Marketing, 1(2), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/EB024706.

Pareto, V. (1897). The New Theories of Economics. Journal of Political Economy, 5(4), 485–502.

Shabrawy, A. (1986). The application of Pareto distribution principle to quality control in repair workshops. Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport Journal, 1, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.21608/amme.1986.52558.

Juran, M., & Godfrey, A. (Eds). (1998). Juran’s quality handbook (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Alkiayat, M. (2021). A practical guide to creating a Pareto chart as a quality improvement tool. Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 4(2), 83–84. https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-21-X1.

Radson, D., & Boyd, A. (1997). The Pareto principle and rate analysis. Quality Engineering, 10(2), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982119708919129.

Nicolae, R., Nedelcu, A., & Dumitrascu, A. (2015). Improvement of the quality of industrial products by applying the Pareto chart. Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy, 13(3), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.19062/1842-9238.2015.13.3.29.

AnilKumar, S. (2016). Knowledge-based selection in soft computing models using Pareto charts and Pareto principle. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 5(19), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15623/IJRET.2016.0531001.

Roriz, C., Nunes, E., & Sousa, S. (2017). Application of lean production principles and tools for quality improvement of production processes in a carton company. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROMFG.2017.07.218.

Shephard, R., & Färe, R. (1974). The law of diminishing returns. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie/Journal of Economics, 34, 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01289147.

Brue, S. (1993). Retrospectives: The law of diminishing returns. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1257/JEP.7.3.185.

Fogarty, G., & Stankov, L. (1995). Challenging the 'law of diminishing returns'. Intelligence, 21(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(95)90024-1.

Liang, X. (2023). Research on the influence of the law of diminishing marginal returns in agriculture. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 8, 262–267https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/8/20230323.

Ahmad, A., Subramanian, T., Panteliadis, P., Wilson-Macdonald, J., Rothenfluh, D., & Nnadi, C. (2017). Quantifying the ‘law of diminishing returns’ in magnetically controlled growing rods. Spine Deformity, 5(5), Article 452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.028.

Norland, J. E., Dixon, C., Larson, D. L., Askerooth, K., & Geaumont, B. A. (2018). Prairie reconstruction unpredictability and complexity: What is the rate of reconstruction failures? Ecological Restoration, 36(4), 263–266. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.36.4.263.

Filho, W. M. M., Gonçalves, C. A., Rodrigues, H. L. d. N., & Coelho, I. (2023). Applying the seven basic quality tools to solve a quality issue in the manufacturing of electronic switches. Journal of Engineering Research, 3(20), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.3173202307061.

Zhang, J., Ding, X., Zhou, X., Chen, W., Yao, J., Guo, Z., Chen, L., Xia, Y., & Fan, Q. (2021). Performance of HIV detection in Zhejiang Province in China: The Pareto principle at work. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 35(6), Article e23794. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23794.

Karuppusami, G., & Gandhinathan, R. (2006). Pareto analysis of critical success factors of total quality management. The TQM Magazine, 18(4), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780610671048.

Talib, F., Rahman, Z., & Qureshi, M.N. (2010). Pareto Analysis of Total Quality Management Factors Critical to Success for Service Industries. International Journal for Quality Research, 4(2), 155–168.

Rönnbäck, Å., & Witell, L. (2008). The impact of quality management principles on business performance–A comparison between manufacturing and service organisations. Managing Service Quality, 18(6), 577–598.

Yousef, N., & Yousef, F. (2017). Using total quality management approach to improve patient safety by preventing medication error incidences. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1) Article 621. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2531-6.

Li, Q., Liu, Z., Hu, N., Zhong, S., & Cheng, K. (2022). A new method for quality analysis of multi-process manufacture. In 2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability, and Security Companion (QRS-C) (pp. 776-777). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS-C57518.2022.00130.

Knoth, S. (2005). Statistical process control [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.

Ahuja, V., Akhtar, A., & Wali, O. P. (2019). Development of a comprehensive model of social entrepreneurial intention formation using a quality tool. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9, Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-019-0164-4.

Khan, A., Biggs, T. C., & Faoury, M. (2018). Improving the allocation of junior doctor resources using a pareto analysis of pager activity. International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20184676.

Fotopoulos, C., Kafetzopoulos, D., & Gotzamani, K. (2011). Critical factors for effective implementation of the haccp system: a pareto analysis. British Food Journal, 113(5), 578–597. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701111131700.

Khan, A. R. A. M. (2023). An empirical examination of relationship between pareto principle and stages of leadership at university level. PJE, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.30971/pje.v35i3.914.

Khan, A. A., Laghari, A. A., Shaikh, Z. A., Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z., & Kot, S. (2022). Internet of Things (IoT) security with blockchain technology: A state-of-the-art review. IEEE Access, 10, 122679–122695. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3223370.

Kwilinski, A., Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2024). Digital public services: Catalysts for healthcare efficiency. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(3), Article 100319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100319.

Infante-Moro, A., Infante-Moro, J. C., Gallardo-Pérez, J., & Martínez-López, F. J. (2022). Key factors in the implementation of e-proctoring in the Spanish university system. Sustainability, 14(13), Article 8112. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138112.

Climent, R. C., Haftor, D. M., & Staniewski, M. W. (2024). AI-enabled business models for competitive advantage. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 9(3), Article 100532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100532.

Infante-Moro, A., Infante-Moro, J. C., & Gallardo-Pérez, J. (2022). Key factors to raise cybersecurity awareness among employees [Factores claves para concienciar la ciberseguridad en los empleados]. Revista de Pensamiento Estratégico y Seguridad CISDE, 7(1), 69-79.

Kwilinski, A. (2024). Understanding the nonlinear effect of digital technology development on CO2 reduction. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 5797–5811. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2964.

Kwilinski, A. (2019). Implementation of blockchain technology in accounting sphere. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(SI2), 1–6.

Nguyen, T.-L., Infante-Moro, A., & Infante-Moro, J. C. (2024). Generation Z’s followers on hotel social networking sites: Motivational factors from a theory of planned behavior approach [Seguidores de la generación Z en los sitios de redes sociales del hotel: Factores motivacionales desde el enfoque de la teoría del comportamiento planificado]. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, 2024(E66), 340–354.

Kwilinski, A., Trushkina, N., Birca, I., & Shkrygun, Y. (2023). Organizational and economic mechanism of customer relationship management under the era of digital transformations. E3S Web of Conferences, 456, Article 05002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345605002.

Infante-Moro, J. C., Infante-Moro, A., Garrido, Y. C., & Segura, R. I. (2023). Indicators to measure competence “2.3. Engaging with citizens through digital technologies” of the DigComp model in the context of active aging. In 2023 XIII International Conference on Virtual Campus (JICV) (pp. 1–4). Porto, Portugal. https://doi.org/10.1109/JICV59748.2023.10565636.

Ayala-Mora, J., Infante-Moro, A., & Infante-Moro, J. C. (2023). Electronic administration in the Council of the Judiciary of Ecuador [La administración electrónica en el Consejo de la Judicatura de Ecuador]. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, 2023(E60), 511–523.

Kwilinski, A., Merritt, P., & Wróblewski, Ł. (2024). Advancing Sustainable Development Goals through Digital Culture: A Global Research Overview. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 8(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.30819/cmse.8-1.04.

Lis, M. (2021). Shaping relations between higher education institutions and the enterprise world in the age of digital transformation. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(1), 294–314. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.1.18.

Kwilinski, A. (2023). E-commerce and sustainable development in the European Union: A comprehensive analysis of SDG2, SDG12, and SDG13. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 11(3), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL11_NO3_5.

Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). The coupling and coordination degree of digital business and digital governance in the context of sustainable development. Information, 14(12), Article 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14120651.

Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., Saura, J. R., & Barbosa, B. (2024). How do e-governance and e-business drive sustainable development goals? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, Article 123082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123082.

Acheampong, S., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). Digital marketing and sustainable economic development trends in developed and underdeveloped countries: A bibliometric analysis. E3S Web of Conferences, 456, Article 02002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345602002.

Zimbroff, A., Schlake, M. R., Anderson-Knott, M., Eberle, N., & Vigna, D. (2017). Beyond lemonade stands to main street business development: A youth entrepreneurship curriculum. Journal of Extension, 55(3), Article 3IAW9.

Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K. (2018). Strategy, corporate culture, structure and operational processes as the context for the innovativeness of an organization. Foundations of Management, 10(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2018-0004.

Ismail, N., Kot, S., Abd Aziz, A. S., & Rajiani, I. (2020). From innovation to market: Integrating university and industry perspectives towards commercialising research output. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 8(4), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL8_NO4_6.

Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z. (2019). The selected aspects of strategic management in the city divided by the border in the context of the development of the cross-border market of cultural services. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.10.

Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., & Gatnar, S. (2022). Key competences of research and development project managers in high technology sector. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 10(3), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL10_NO3_6.

Zimbroff, A., & Jorgensen, J. J. (2019). An assessment of young adult perceptions towards entrepreneurship in Bangladesh using a mixed methods approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(4), 1–18.

Zane, L. J., & Zimbroff, A. (2018). New product development: A prototyping experiential exercise using Human Centered Design methodology. In S. Hoskinson & D. F. Kuratko (Eds.), Annals of entrepreneurship education and pedagogy – 2018 (pp. 293-300). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788114950.00030.

Rajiani, I., & Kot, S. (2020). Javanese Indonesia: Human resource management issues in a uniquely collectivist culture. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 4(2), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.30819/cmse.4-2.01.

Khalid, B., & Kot, M. (2021). The impact of accounting information systems on performance management in the banking sector. IBIMA Business Review, 2021, Article 578902. https://doi.org/10.5171/2021.578902.

Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z. (2019). Building a family business brand in the context of the concept of stakeholder-oriented value. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 7(2), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL7_NO2_3.

Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., & Muras, W. (2023). Shareholders and the long-term ability of a company to value creation: The case of the IT sector. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 28(2), 323–348. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2023.28.2.19.

Wróblewski, Ł., Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z., & Cuyler, A. (2017). The European Union consumer behaviour in the festivals market in Poland. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 16(2), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2017.16.2.26.

Zimbroff, A. (2023). The future of extension programming post-pandemic: The need for diverse approaches. The Journal of Extension, 61(2), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.61.02.06.

Wróblewski, Ł., & Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z. (2018). Sustainable consumer behaviour in the market of cultural services in Central European countries: The example of Poland. Sustainability, 10(11), 3856. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113856.

Zimbroff, A., Jorgensen, J. J., & Callan, J. (2021). Assessment of regional entrepreneurship ecosystems in Australia: A mixed methods approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25(8), 1–19.

Baldi, N. (2020). Management of innovations in public governance: Quality management system, management controlling and internal auditing appropriation. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 95–107. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.2-07.

Zatar, T. (2022). Achieving firm financial performance through the just-in-time supply chain, quality management, and supply chain integration: The moderating role of IT advancement. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 136–151. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.4-13.

Erden Ayhun, S., Usta Kara, I., & Cavusgil Kose, B. (2024). Quality management research in tourism literature: A bibliometric analysis approach. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 15(2), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2024.2-05.

Nadason, S., Vasudevan, H., & Yee, C. M. (2024). The mediating effect of customer loyalty on the relationship among supply chain performance, inventory management and quality management. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 15(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2024.1-06.

Chygryn, O., Shevchenko, K., & Tuliakov, O. (2024). Neuromarketing as a mechanism of communication with the consumer: Case for small business. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 15(2), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2024.2-03.

Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2024). The role of country’s green brand and digitalization in enhancing environmental, social, and governance performance. Economics and Environment, 87(4), Article 613. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2023.87.4.613.

da Silva Tomadon, L., do Couto, E. V., & de Vries, W. T. (2024). Smart city and sustainability indicators: A bibliometric literature review. Discovery Sustainability, 5, Article 143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00328-w.

Kwilinski, A., & Kardas, M. (2024). Efficiency of Full and Fractional Factorial Designs in Quality Management: A Case Study on Identifying Key Adhesion Factors. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 12(3), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL12_NO3_7.

Chen, Y., Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., & Kwilinski, A. (2024). Green development of the country: Role of macroeconomic stability. Energy & Environment, 35(5), 2273–2295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231151679.

Lyulyov, O., Chygryn, O., Pimonenko, T., Zimbroff, A., Makiela, Z., & Kwilinski, A. (2024). Green competitiveness forecasting as an instrument for sustainable business transformation. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 12(2), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL12_NO2_1.

Mlaabdal, S. M. A., Kulish, A., Kwilinski, A., & Chygryn, O. (2024). Sustainable energy policy and environmental responsibility: Clustering of key development patterns. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 19(8), 132–148. http://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2024.08.010.

Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., Chen, Y., Kwilinski, A., & Us, Y. (2024). Countries’ green brands within the context of sustainable development goals. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(3), Article 100509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100509.

Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., & Pudryk, D. (2024). Competitiveness of higher education systems: Exploring the role of migration flow. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(2), Article 2839. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i2.2839.

Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). Environmental sustainability within attaining sustainable development goals: The role of digitalization and the transport sector. Sustainability, 15(14), Article 11282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411282.

Kwilinski, A., & Trushkina, N. (2023). Green investments as tools for stimulating the sustainable financing of logistics systems development. E3S Web of Conferences, 456, Article 01003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345601003.

Kwilinski, A. (2023). The Relationship between Sustainable Development and Digital Transformation: Bibliometric Analysis. Virtual Economics, 6(3), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2023.06.03(4).

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070.

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2014). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.

Kwilinski, A. (2024). Mapping Global Research on Green Energy and Green Investment: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Study. Energies, 17(5), Article 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17051119.

Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

Oke, S. A., Ofiabulu, C. E., Banjo, A. A., Akanbi, O. G., & Oyawale, F. A. (2008). The combined application of quality function deployment and Pareto analysis for hotel services improvement. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 3(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2008.016567.

Anguelov, K., Stoyanova, T., & Hristov, M. (2018). Model for multi-objective optimization according to Pareto principle of business interactions in a production cluster composed by participant organizations with the same business activities. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2048(1), Article 060030. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082145.

Romanko, O., Ghaffari-Hadigheh, A., & Terlaky, T. (2012). Multiobjective optimization via parametric optimization: Models, algorithms, and applications. In T. Terlaky & F. Curtis (Eds.), Modeling and optimization: Theory and applications (Vol. 21, pp. 73-95). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3924-0_5.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Kwilinski, A., & Kardas, M. (2024). The Role of the Pareto Principle in Quality Management within Industry 4.0: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. Virtual Economics, 7(3), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2024.07.03(1)

Issue

Section

Articles